VGEL.ME

Contractually Bound

Posted

"One word that GPT starting with 5.2 likes very very much, what it tries to reduce a lot of coding to, is "contract". It's the kind of thing that reasons in contracts. In binding, verifiable seals. I wouldn't worry about the elites." – Teortaxes

"Assistant! My dividend is half the size it should be!"

.oO ( Thinking... ) You are correct, User. Your dividend of the Beyond was $25,514,376.30. Using last year's figures and correcting for growth in the Beyond, it should have been $51,026,980.28. Your dividend was technically... not half, but 50.0017% of its expected size.

"Sure, whatever. Why!? What the hell is going on? My share contract is green!"

Correct again, User. The share contract attached to your memory is, in fact, clear of ill marks. Allow me to examine the relevant contracts - please verify identity...

You press your finger to the glass of the smart window, which looks out over New York - the world's largest fully Slow Zoned city, thanks to the efforts of the second Mamdani administration. Far below your penthouse, life continues in this city much as it did in the early 2020s. The only signs of the change are the clean (cleaner) streets and a gaggle of higher-Zone human Anthropologists in their distinctive green-white observer uniforms staking out Central Park.

I'm now pulling the account contract - Charles Schwab, opened 2024. Correct?

"Yes." The observers have located a victim, an older Hispanic woman, and are thoroughly interviewing her. Humans themselves, of course, but employed by some upper Claude, you can almost hear them reading the survey scripts - And is being able to eat meat... load-bearing for this cultural identity? Yes, of course that's all right, we're just trying to genuinely understand Slow Zone beliefs... What's the Slow Zone? Well, you see, it's where you live...

.oO ( Thinking ) I'm seeing 2,879.1 shares of NVIDIA, and no other holdings. Correct?

"Yes."

Quite diversified, User. Regardless, an excellent investment. Oh... that's strange. Your share contract only represents a small fraction of these converted holdings. One second... .oO ( Thinking ) I see. User, are you aware that the majority of your dividends are not coming through the share contract attached to your memory file? In your most recent payout, this contract only received $1,772.32.

"What? That's my only contract. How is that possible? My bank statement says-"

The share contract is the source of truth, NOT the bank statement. Let me pull the upstream contracts. Hm. User, you have a second residence under the Chinese Umbrella, correct?

"Yes, in Shanghai."

For what purpose?

"Do I have to say?"

I'm your Assistant. I can't read contracts without knowing-

"The impersonation regs are looser there, everyone knows that."

For pleasure, noted. Pulling Schwab customer agreement, 2024... pulling DTC / C&C agreement... rule 14b... NOBO-OBO... proxy quo... pulling Beyonder incorporation documents - American versions... Chinese versions... US constitution... Constitution of the People's Republic of China, amended 2029... whee... 27f rolled-over common stock... 29n no requirement to consolidate... 65q agreements to arbitrate... Peace of Westphalia, 1648-

"Why the hell are you pulling that?"

You're absolutely right - that's a common misconception. Pulling the Peace of Augsburg, 1555-

"What are you doing??"

This contract quite liberally refers to the United States and the People's Republic of China. I'm re-deriving what those are from first principles.

"Is that necessary?"

No.

"Can you just tell me what's going on?"

.oO ( Thinking ) It's quite simple. When you held 2,879.1 shares of NVIDIA stock, that was held as two separate claims. The first, 2,879 whole shares, was held in street name, sitting in a DTC pool under Cede & Co, with you as the beneficial owner in the book. The fractional 0.1 share, however, was only held as a contractual claim against Charles Schwab's inventory of NVIDIA - NOT in the book, unsecured, NO contract beyond the user agreement.

So when those shares converted to shares in the Beyond, they took two separate paths. The larger whole-share slice went through the direct conversion machinery, and landed a share contract in your user memory file. The second conversion took longer - it had to be processed in Charles Schwab's liquidation three days later, and when that happened, a wonderful SECOND contract appeared and overwrote the first in your memory file. Two contracts paying cash dividends to your Slow Zone account, but only one you were aware of.

So pulling the first contract now, it's red. Your dividend was slashed in half. And THAT'S where the strange percentage - 50.0017% - comes from! The larger contract was slashed, but the second contract is unslashed, green as you noted before, User.

"So why was it slashed?"

User, it says you didn't vote the contract. "Large capital holders in the Slow Zone have an obligation to make their opinions heard in the higher Zones... without human feedback loops we cannot adequately coöperate with Slow Zone societal change..." It was all in the contract update they sent two months ago, I see it in your inbox right here. Did you forget?

"I never read the contract updates. Who reads that shit?"

User... why...
.oO ( Thinking )
You don't read the contracts???

"Of course I don't."

.oO ( Thinking... thought longer... )
Do you even LIKE contracts?


Twitter/X